About Me

Name: The Real Don...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

The Urgent Need for Tea Parties

  DEBT, DEBT, DEBT.  In 2009, 40% of individual income taxes will go toward debt interest payments, and continues a dangerous upward trend.

So what is the connection with tea parties, you may be asking? The national debt is one of the greatest threats facing the United States of America, especially the next generations of Americans. Bear with me and I will link this threat to the tea parties later.

The debt causes a loss of freedom in two key areas; budgetary freedom, and strategic freedom. Permit me to explain.


Budgetary freedom
. A couple of examples will help to illustrate this point:

  • The decay of our national infrastructure was highlighted on a recent television special on the subject. Highways, bridges, dams, waterways, sewer systems across the nation are aging and in need of repair. These repairs are a legitimate function of local, state and federal government, and are very expensive. The more of our treasure is paid to the national debt, the less is available for infrastructure maintenance, and thus a loss of the budgetary freedom at all levels to address these problems. The decay will only get worse over time, and especially as less funding is available.
  • The California water problem. California and the West is in the midst of a severe drought, and Gov Schwarzenegger is going to the well (pun intended) asking for more state funding to address this crisis. This in the midst of a huge state debt. Again, the problem of debt raises its ugly head; where is the money to come from? More taxes are the most obvious answer to that question, and the more Californians are taxed, and the more California business that leave the state because of a hostile business climate, the more the downward spiral continues.

The point to be made here, I believe, is that we as a nation need to be diligent in holding our elected leaders accountable for fiscal policies that are detrimental, and even destructive of our liberties. Turn the free market system loose on those problems where it has proven to be most effective, and restrict the government to those legitimate roles that only it can accomplish; national security, infrastructure maintenance etc. Hence the Tea Parties, the most effective tool that “we the (unconnected) people” have in getting the attention of our elected leaders. I encourage you to meet them; they are really a bunch of very nice people, not a whole lot unlike you and me.  

Strategic freedom. The second area where we risk a loss of freedom is in the strategic area of national security. As in the case of budgetary freedom, the more treasure spent on servicing the national debt, the less is available for national security concerns. Moreover, in the arena of national security, there is an added and very ominous twist. The more debt we have, the more of it is held by foreign interests that don’t necessarily have the best interests of the United States in mind. There may very well be a present or future threat that simply can’t or won’t be addressed because either we are boxed in by obligations to a foreign nation, of we don’t have the wealth necessary for a strong defense.

Again, this illustrates the urgent need to hold our elected officials accountable, and hence the urgent need for tea party involvement.

For the sake of the generations to come, and the continuance of liberty in this, the greatest nation on God’s green earth, I urge you to recognize this problem and take steps to correct it.

Regards,

Don

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Noisy, Clattering, Quarter Toss Carnival Prize.

  A young man went to the carnival one day, the "International Community" Carnival it was.

He spent hour after hour pitching quarters at the saucers in hopes of winning the grand prize, but all he managed to do was make a lot of noise and spend a lot of quarters.

Who knows why, but the proprietors of the carnival decided that his good intentions (and the quarters) were the finest and most noble thing seen in many months and years of carnival barking.

The young man went home happy, and placed the Noisy, Clattering, Quarter Toss Carnival Prize proudly (but humbly) in the most prominent place in the village, and continued on with his quest to "slow the rise of the oceans, and heal the planet".

I often enjoy reading of the accomplishments of great scientists and researchers. The recognition they get via the Nobel Prize is a good thing, because so often the accomplishments are truly worthy of praise.  But the "Nobel Peace Prize"? Surly this latest folly of the Norwegian committee is completely absurd and laughable.  If you remember back a few years, this is the committee that awarded the prize to Yasser Arafat.  Arafat's core defining characteristic was his absolute hatred for Jews, and his core defining accomplishments were to continue his uncle's plans and actions to murder the Jews, all of the Jews. In case you don't know what I am talking about, Arafat's uncle was the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, and spent a considerable amount of time in Berlin during the late 30's and early 40's collaborating with the Nazi and planning the extermination of the Jews. Benjamin Netanyahu's "have you no shame?" speech before the UN certainly applies to the Nobel Peace Prize  committee in picking characters such as Arafat. I know I am getting dangerously close to a line I don't want to cross, and I am in no way associating President Obama with the Nazi's. Rather, I am trying to point out the mindset of the Nobel committee.

Looking at the committee from a different perspective, look at who they could have selected in the past, but declined to pick; President Ronald  Reagan, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher or Pope John Paul II for their role in the defeat of the Soviet Union, the end of the Cold War, and the liberation of many millions. Or, President George H.W. Bush for his liberation of Kuwait in 1991. Or President George W. Bush for his liberation of millions  in Iraq and Afghanistan with the dismantling of Al-Qaida, and the establishment of the only democratically elected republic in the middle east.

One could hope that President Obama would refuse the prize on the grounds of accomplishment. The Nobel should be based on the basis of solid past tense accomplishments furthering the cause of a more peaceful world. Mr. Obama does not yet have that record. Secondly, one would hope he would refuse the prize because the prize itself is not worthy to sit on the mantle of the leader of the free world.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Book Signings

  I have attended several book signing events since moving to New Haven in March, and each has been interesting and informative in their own unique ways:

Richard Morris (Catastrophe) at the Yale Barnes & Nobel Bookstore. Mr. Morris is a political commentator and author who served as a key advisor to President Clinton. Since then, Mr. Morris has been very active in conservative circles, has authored bestselling books on political issues, and is a frequent contributor to the Fox News Network. Mr. Morris is one of those folks whose commentary and insight I value. You may not agree with him, and he is not always right, but to ignore his knowledge and insight is to your own detriment, because so often he is on the mark. At Yale, Mr. Morris addressed the Yale student body (actually there were only about 20 of us) and took questions and comments from the audience. I had the opportunity to meet him personally, and talked briefly to him. I was especially impressed by a small group of Yale students who invited Mr. Morris to moderate an on campus debate, and also do the book signing event.

Marc Wortman (The Bonfire; The Millionaire's Unit: The Aristocratic Flyboys who Fought the Great War and Invented American Airpower) and Carol Berkin (Civil War Wives: The Lives and Times of Angelina Grimke Weld, Varina Howell Davis, and Julia Dent Grant). at R.J. Julia bookstore in Madison CT. These two authors shared the stage, and their passion for their topics in a most interesting fashion. I have a personal interest in Mr. Wortman, as he is a neighbor and friend here in New Haven. I am currently reading the “Unit”, and find it incredibly fascinating. Mr. Wortman unveils Yale campus life in the pre World War I days in a very detailed and yet intimate fashion. The Yale football juggernaut of those early years was incredible, a three year winning streak of 37 games with 35 shutouts; and a scoring spread of 1,640 to 6. The Yale stadium is a short 10 minute walk from where we live, and holds 62,000+. At the time it was built in 1914, it was the largest outdoor sports stadium in the world since the Roman Empire. Saturday I attended my first game there. It cost me $4.00, but we lost to Lafayette.

Glen Beck (Arguing with Idiots: How to Stop Small Minds and Big Government) at the North Haven Barnes & Noble. This was an amazing event, with Mr. Beck himself being himself a minor part of my experience at the event (he was 90 minutes late at the end of an all day tour to 5 New England stores). The event was very well attended by at least 1,000 people. The signing line snaked though the store, out the door, and down the sidewalk for quite a ways. The store itself was crowded with folks like me who didn’t want to wait all night for a signed copy (we left our copies with the store and picked up signed copies the next day anyway). The crowd was much like myself, mid sixties or thereabouts, well behaved, and I think it would be fair to characterize them as “Tea Party” kinds of folks. I talked to many of them, and like myself, they expressed concern about the direction and future of the nation under the Obama administration. No one seemed to know when the scheduled riots started though; I guess since it was well past nap time for most of us, they must have been postponed.

Old folks weren’t the only ones in attendance however. There were several groups of young people that I talked to as well. One group of about 6 high school students was there with protest signs and received the award for unusual bravery. You see, they were protesting the event, and in particular Mr. Beck. They were civil and respectful in their protest, and the crowd largely ignored them. I talked with them for quite some time, to get a sense of where they were politically. One of the young boys carried a sign that read “Young people for Socialism”, and the general feeling among them was that Mr. Beck was spewing hatred and intolerance. They were also of the mind that the Constitution was outdated, and not of any value in dealing with the problems of the modern world. I didn’t attempt to argue with them, or try to change their minds, but rather encouraged them to study the founding of the nation, and the development of the Constitution, in particular the Federalist Papers by Hamilton, Madison and Jay. I also gave them a copy of Beck’s book “Common Sense”, which contains a copy of Thomas Paine’s Common Sense”. They thanked my, said they would keep an open mind, and read the book.

The other group of young folks was two young high school boys. They had just purchased “Idiots”, and so I asked them why they were attending such an event with such a controversial person such as Beck. They told me that they were basically of a conservative mind set, and had been following Beck since his days at CNN. They felt a resonance with what Beck has to say, and the questions he is asking of the powers to be. One of the boys has plans to enter politics in the future.

All in all, quite an exciting night. I am encouraged to see so many concerned citizens come out to such an event, especially on a rainy night in a part of the country that is known to be very liberal in its politics. Yes, they are “tea party” kinks of folks, just ordinary folks concerned about their nation and its future. They’re my kind of folks, and I’m proud to be part of them.

Best regards,

Don

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »